Related Practice Lines

eDiscovery

Since eDiscovery exploded in the mid-2000s, Zelle has been at the forefront in meeting the needs of its clients to comply with eDiscovery standards. Zelle designed, created, and uses knowledgeable in-house eDiscovery experts and tools, including an in-house Legal Technology support team. Zelle’s eDiscovery group is designed to provide our clients with the highest quality services and state-of-the-art technology.

Zelle’s eDiscovery practice (1) understands the law and requirements of eDiscovery so that we can make informed decisions with our clients about the best and most efficient way to navigate complex and often voluminous eDiscovery requirements; (2) works to control the eDiscovery process up front, working with counsel and the parties to set reasonable limits on scope and form of production in place from the outset; and (3) employs best-of-class technology tools and solutions for document review and production.

One of the best benefits of its eDiscovery practice is the ability to host large volumes of documents in-house. By controlling the processing and storage of documents in a case, Zelle’s lawyers have easy and almost immediate access to documents and professionals whose job is to make the process seamless and streamlined. Zelle competitively prices its document processing and storage and offers choices to clients to meet their eDiscovery duties in a cost-effective matter.

Our Commitment
Legal Technology Team
Services
Technology

Representative Matters

Defense Contractor v. Insurer.
Zelle lawyers successfully defended the insurer in this coverage dispute for over $1 billion arising out of Hurricane Katrina. LTG hosted this matter with 85 users (multiple law firms and experts used the database to assist in the adjustment and litigation). The database also housed nearly a million documents and 7.4 million pages of e-mails and engineering file types from multiple parties.
National Bank Antitrust Litigation (Joint Defense).
This dispute over a Securities Lending Program involved multiple litigated matters. LTG hosted these cases over an eight-year period during which the database contained over 12.3 million pages and supported 70 users accessing the documents from multiple parties including co-counsel and experts.
Oil Company v. 9 Insurers.
This arbitration matter related to a refinery coverage dispute involving a nine-figure claim. The case contained more than 200,000 files including e-mail and complex engineering documents from nine insurance companies and over 50 third-parties.
Technology Related Antitrust Litigation (Joint Defense).
LTG hosted the data over a four-year period and maintained a document database for the purposes of reviewing, organizing, and managing nearly 11 million pages, comprising over one million documents, produced by Defendants in this matter.

+ See More Representative Matters

Related Practice Lines

eDiscovery

Representative Matters

Our Team

Partners

Counsel & Associates

Legal Technology Group